Reach out to us on whatsapp
NGP Arts NGP Arts

NAAC Third Cycle - SSR

Criterion I: - Curricular Aspects

Criterion II: - Teaching Learning and Evaluation

Metric 2.1.1. Average Enrolment percentage

Metric 2.1.2. Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years

Metric 2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners

Metric 2.2.2. Student - Full time teacher ratio

Metric 2.3.1. Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences

Experiential Learning
Participative Learning
Problem Solving Methodology
NDL - NList

Metric 2.3.2. Teachers use ICT enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process

Metric 2.3.3. Ratio of students to mentor for academic and other related issues

Metric 2.3.4. Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution

Metric 2.4.1. Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts

Metric 2.4.2. Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Super specialty / D.Sc. / D.Litt

Metric 2.4.3. Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution

Metric 2.5.1. Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years

Metric 2.5.2. Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years

Metric 2.5.3. IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes

Metric 2.6.1. Programme outcomes and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution

Metric 2.6.2. Attainment of program outcomes and course outcomes

Metric 2.6.3 Pass percentage of students

Metric 2.7.1. Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process

Criterion III: - Research, Innovations and Ecosystem

Metric 3.5.1 : Revenue generated from Consultancy

Metric 3.5.2 : Amount spent on developing facilities, training teachers

Metric 3.6.1 : Extension Activities

Metric 3.6.2 : Awards and Recognition

Metric 3.6.3 Extension Activities & Outreach Programs

Metric 3.6.4. Number of students participating in Extension Activities

Criterion IV: - Infrastructure and Learning Resources


Metric 4.1.2. Facilities for cultural activities, yoga, games and sports

Metric 4.1.3: Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT- enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS, etc.

Metric 4.1.4: Expenditure for infrastructure augmentation, excluding salary year-wise during last five years

Metric 4.2.1: Library Automation

Metric 4.2.2: Institution access to e-resources & data bases

4.2.3: Annual expenditure for Library

4.2.4: Number of teacher and students using library

Metric 4.3.1: Institutions IT Policy and Budget

Metric 4.3.2: Student Computer Ratio

Metric 4.3.3: Bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution

Metric 4.3.4: Facility for e-content development

Metric 4.4.1: Percentage of Expenditure incurred on infrastructure maintenance

Metric 4.4.1: Annual Expenditure for infrastructure maintenance

Metric 4.4.2: Established Systems and Procedure for Utilization and Maintenance

Criterion V: - Student Support and Progression

Metric 5.1.1. SC ST Scholarships and Freeships

Metric 5.1.2. Institutional Scholarships and Freeship

Metric 5.1.3. Capacity Development and Skill Enhancement activities

Metric 5.1.4. Guidance for Competitive Examinations and Career Counselling

Metric 5.1.5. Policies adopted by institution for students grievances

Metric 5.2.1. Placement of Outgoing Students

Metric 5.2.2. Student Progression to Higher Education

Metric 5.2.3. Students Qualifying State/National/International level exams

Metric 5.3.1. Awards/Medals for Outstanding performance

Metric 5.3.2. Student Council & Representation

Metric 5.3.3. Sports and Cultural events organized by the institution

Criterion VI: - Governance, Leadership and Management

Metric 6.1.1. The governance of the institution is reflective of an effective leadership in tune with the vision and mission of the Institution

Metric 6.1.2. The effective leadership is reflected in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management

Metric 6.2.1. The institutional Strategic/ Perspective plan is effectively deployed

1. Meeting Minutes of Strategic Planning and Execution Committee
2. Department Strategic Plan
3. Institutional Perspective Plan

Metric 6.2.2. The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup appointment and service rules, procedures

Metric 6.2.3. Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation

1. Administration
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination

Metric 6.3.1. The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/ progression

General Welfare measures
Monetary Welfare Measures
Avenues for career development

6.3.2. Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years

6.3.3 Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the Institution for teaching and non-teaching staff during the last five years.

List of professional development/administrative training programs organized by the institution
Brochures and Report
List of participants in each program.
Photographs of the programs

6.3.4. Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes during the last five years

6.4.1. Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly

Metric 6.4.2. Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years

6.4.3. Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources

6.5.1. Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes visible in terms of –

1. Collaborative learning
2. Undergraduate Research

6.5.2. The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms


Metric 6.5.3. Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include

Accreditation Certificates
Annual Report
IQAC Meeting Minutes and Action Taken Report
Academic Year 2020-21
Academic Year 2019-20
Academic Year 2018-19
Academic Year 2017-18
Academic Year 2016-17
Collaborative quality Initiative with other Institutions
Student Quality Assurance Cell

Criterion VII: - Institutional Values and Best Practices

Metric 7.1.1. Gender Equity

1. Annual Gender Sensitization Action Plan
2. Gender Based Activities
3. Specific Facilities Provided for Women
4. Yoga Facilities – MoU

Metric 7.1.2. Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability

Metric 7.1.3. Management of degradable and non-degradable waste

Metric 7.1.4. Water Conservation Facilities

Metric 7.1.5. Initiatives for Greening the campus

Metric 7.1.6. Quality Audits – Environment, Energy and Green

Metric 7.1.7. Divyangjan Facilities

Metric 7.1.8. Initiatives in providing an inclusive environment

Report of events pertaining to providing inclusive environment

Metric 7.1.9. Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations

Report of events - Sensitization Activities towards Constitutional Obligations

Metric 7.1.10. Code of Conduct

Metric 7.1.11. Institution celebrates / organizes national and international commemorative days

Report of Events – Important Days Celebrated / Observed

Metric 7.2.1. Two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution

Metric 7.3.1. Performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority